caz963: (Jack b&w)
caz963 ([personal profile] caz963) wrote2007-07-03 01:15 pm
Entry tags:

Oh bo***cks

Doctor Who S4 spoiler within.

Bugger.

[identity profile] caz963.livejournal.com 2007-07-03 02:17 pm (UTC)(link)
Simply replacing Martha with some other potential love interest for The Doctor wouldn't be a good basis for a compelling character

Exactly what I thought when I heard they were replacing one attractive young woman with another.
I liked Rose far more with Christopher Eccleston's doctor and I felt that in the later Tennant episodes, she was also guilty of making the "cow eyes" rather too often.
I'm not one of those purists who insists that the doctor remains asexual - I grew up with Doctor Who (my doctors were Jon Pertwee and Tom Baker) and there was often a frisson between him and his female companions, but it was never this overt.
hooloovoo_42: (Master Evil Pout)

[personal profile] hooloovoo_42 2007-07-03 04:46 pm (UTC)(link)
You could always tell that Jo fancied the Doctor!

[identity profile] stabbim.livejournal.com 2007-07-04 09:03 am (UTC)(link)
I liked Rose far more with Christopher Eccleston's doctor and I felt that in the later Tennant episodes, she was also guilty of making the "cow eyes" rather too often.

It's become so clichéd that's what's bothering me most. I liked the ep where the Doctor became human and fell in love. Strangely, that didn't feel as forced.

Have you read the most recent casting spoilers? I still don't know what to think about that.

I watched old episodes of Doctor Who at our local "Trek Dinner", but I didn't really get into it till the Christopher Eccleston. I'm open-minded when it comes to romantic storylines... if they're done well. And that's usually the tricky part.