caz963: (splody tardis)
caz963 ([personal profile] caz963) wrote2010-06-26 10:03 pm
Entry tags:

DW 5x13 - The Big Bang

Um. Well, I’m not sure what to make of that, actually. I enjoyed it, but – it left me feeling a bit flat, and I’m trying to work out why.



The comedy element was great – Matt popping up with the fez and the mop; the destruction of the fez, Amy yelling that the Doctor was late for her wedding and then his spazzy Dad-Dancing.

I was so glad to see Amelia again; Caitlin Blackwood is a very talented little girl.

River continues to be awesome. How badass was she with that Dalek? And you have to love that whole “what on earth have you got on your head?” bit. I’m also pleased that she’ll be back next series – even before I watched the DWC, I realized that if we are, as Moff promised, to see her story play out and find out who she really is, she’ll have to come back, so that’s all good.

RORY!! Yes – he’s back, he’s alive and he’s Mr Pond! I hope he sticks around for the next series; it’ll be interesting to have a proper couple on board the TARDIS, and will reinforce that whole avuncular thing that Eleven’s got going on with his companions.

The best scene of the episode was undoubtedly that of Eleven sitting by Amelia’s bedside, talking to her as she sleeps. Matt Smith absolutely nailed it there as he spoke about the silly old man who ‘borrowed’ the TARDIS and ran away… the times we never had… in your dreams, they’ll still be there… the Doctor and Amy Pond… and the days that never came - was truly wibble-inducing.

The plotty stuff all tied up nicely – we meet jacket!Doctor, finally, and discover how he’s travelling around and why, we find out what the Doctor told Amy when she was seven, what happened to her family - and the cracks are closed – with him on the other side. I’m still not sure how he rescued River though – I’ll have to check that out when I rewatch it.

We didn’t find out who or what was behind it all, but the Doctor as good as told us that that will be the theme for the next series – which Moff confirmed later in the DWC. I’ve got no complaints about that either – it would have made things pretty crowded for a 55 minute episode if we’d had to have all that resolved as well.

So, given that I liked all those things, why do I still feel dissatisfied? The only reason I can come up with at the moment is because the tone was so different to that of the previous episode, which was a bloody good set up. I’ve just said in a comment to my earlier post that at the end of episode 12, things were very dark; the TARDIS was exploding, the universe was ending, the stars were going out… and then suddenly, “oh look, it’s a mad man with a mop!” Don’t get me wrong – I liked that bit, and again, Matt played it beautifully – I was just using it to illustrate the point I’m trying to make.

And while I know that the importance of memory has been hammered home time and time again this series, I don’t quite understand how Amy’s memory of the Doctor enabled him to come back. We’ve heard that time can be rewritten several times and also last week that remembering something that’s gone means it can come back… I’m just not sure how.

But I suppose that’s a bit nit-picky, because let’s face it, this is Doctor Who and not a documentary!

To my mind then, this finale suffered from a bit of Rusty-itis in that the second part didn’t really live up to the promise of the first. And surely, the concept was madder than anything Rusty ever did – I mean, he never blew up the TARDIS and had the universe disappear from existence as a result! And instead of “the year that never was”, we have… er… “the lifetimes that never were” or something like that.

So yes, while I loved bits of it – quite a few bits of it, actually - I think it’s an example of the whole not quite equalling the sum of its parts.

Then again, I suppose the “everybody lives” theme is much more in keeping with Moff’s vision of DW as the fairytale for kids – both big and small.

Oh – and are we getting a repeat of VotD with an alien on the Orient Express at Christmas, or was that just a throwaway line? (I’m inclined to think the latter.)

Let’s hope that Amy will have grown into a nicer person next series; and I’m delighted that we’ll be getting more Eleven and Rory, because they’re great together.

And there we have it. The first series of Rusty-less Doctor Who. My favourite episodes were by writers other than Steven Moffat – Simon Nye and Richard Curtis, both of whom I hope can be induced to write for DW again.

One question - does the destruction of reality and Big Bang 2 which created a universe in which the Doctor never existed mean that all of DW from 1963 until now never happened? Or does the fact that Amy remembers Eleven mean that all of him, from One to Ten, have been re-incorportated into history?

At the end, Eleven distinctly says to River that the writing is back in her diary, and that he hasn't read it. So if the Doctor HAS been returned to our history - does that mean that everyone can suddenly remember the Daleks and the Cybermen and the Slitheen and the Sycorax and all the other stuff that happened over the past five years?

Verdict – liked it for the most part. Eleven, Rory, River – all great, but could have done without Amy.

Oh, and I think they should either dispense with the DWCs next time around, or cut them down to 20 minutes or so. I generally watch them, but there have been a few this series that have felt rather pointless – this one and the one for the Venice episode in particular come to mind, but most of the others have felt over-long. There have been some really good ones in the past – I remember being engrossed by the one for Midnight for example, but they’ve just not worked all that well this time around, IMO. Maybe they should just do some sort of “making of” programme at the end of the series next time, or do some one-offs, rather than one per episode.
hooloovoo_42: (Josh Coffee)

[personal profile] hooloovoo_42 2010-06-26 09:29 pm (UTC)(link)
Agree on the DWC. The few I've watched in this season have been more repeated repeats of clips with a bit of behind the scenes. Having a 45 minute explanation of each 45 minute show seems a bit much to me. If the repeats can be cut down to 15 minutes, that seems more like the ideal length.

And yes, the good bits didn't add up to anything more than reasonable.

[identity profile] topaz-eyes.livejournal.com 2010-06-27 12:54 am (UTC)(link)
I’m still not sure how he rescued River though – I’ll have to check that out when I rewatch it.

Just before the TARDIS exploded, it put River into a few-second time loop until the Doctor came and rescued her from it.

does the destruction of reality and Big Bang 2 which created a universe in which the Doctor never existed mean that all of DW from 1963 until now never happened? Or does the fact that Amy remembers Eleven mean that all of him, from One to Ten, have been re-incorportated into history?

It could work both ways, I think? The Doctor said that the atoms of the original universe that were trapped in the Pandorica with Amy, would be enough to restore all the original universe, and, I assume, everything that happened in it. (As suggested with the words reappearing in River's diary at the end.) OTOH, since 7-year-old Amelia met the Doctor only once, then IMHO only what she knew of him, either from real life or from her dreams, would be restored. TBH I was wondering if Moffat was going to do a retcon. He did, and he didn't, it just depends on how we choose to see it. So well played, sir, well played.

I did find a major plot hole with Amy though; if she were already nearly dead when she were put in the Pandorica, and the Pandorica holds its prisoner in stasis, then theoretically she should still have been nearly dead when she was released from it. Unless we're to handwave it away by saying the Pandorica has mystical healing powers. (ETA: Well, yes, it does. Which--um, well, how deus ex machina convenient.) Which--well, stasis means everything's suspended.

Also, with River, if the Doctor couldn't exist in real life again until Amy remembered him, how could River know to give her (empty) diary to Amy?

I suppose the “everybody lives” theme is much more in keeping with Moff’s vision of DW as the fairytale for kids – both big and small.

and We’ve heard that time can be rewritten several times and also last week that remembering something that’s gone means it can come back… I’m just not sure how.

On one hand, nothing is truly gone as long as we remember it. OTOH, in real life it's still gone: it can't physically return, we can't restore it to life again just by remembering it, as much as we might want to. The implication of Moffat's message, that it can be fully restored just by remembering--I wish it worked that way in real life, but it doesn't. So I must be too cynical for Moffat's Who.
Edited 2010-06-27 02:13 (UTC)

[identity profile] crossoverman.livejournal.com 2010-06-27 01:08 am (UTC)(link)
After making such a big deal earlier in the series, why didn't Amy remember the Daleks? I DON'T UNDERSTAND.

[identity profile] lilachigh.livejournal.com 2010-06-27 07:35 am (UTC)(link)
I felt the same, a bit like you sometimes used to do when you were a teenager at Christmas - all excited inside because of the memories, and then when it happens, you think "Oh, was that it?"

Basically, although i loved the comedy, hey fez! and if anyone is ever going to play Tommy Cooper in a film, it must be Matt - it seemed out of place in this episode. I just feel it would have been so much stronger if they had played it straight, like Ep 12.